用于EagleEye3.0 规则集漏报和误报测试的示例项目,项目收集于github和gitee
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
 
 
 
 
 
 

98 lines
3.1 KiB

/* Copyright (c) 2017, 2017, Oracle and/or its affiliates.
The code in this file is copied from Boost 1.63.0
boost/functional/hash/hash.hpp, which contains the following copyright notice:
Copyright 2005-2014 Daniel James.
Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying
file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
Based on Peter Dimov's proposal
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2005/n1756.pdf
issue 6.18._
This also contains public domain code from MurmurHash. From the
MurmurHash header:
MurmurHash3 was written by Austin Appleby, and is placed in the public
domain. The author hereby disclaims copyright to this source code. */
/** @file include/my_hash_combine.h
A convenient way to combine two hash values.
It was decided to copy (parts of) the boost::hash_combine() implementation
instead of using it directly (by including <boost/functional/hash.hpp>)
because of the following reasons, raised by Steinar and Tor:
Pros:
- It solves a real problem (how to hash std::pair).
- Few dependencies (just type_traits and enable_if).
- Seems like a reasonable implementation.
Cons:
- It's more Boost.
- Doesn't seem to be accepted into C++17, so it's something we'd have to
drag around for a long time without an easy migration path off it.
- It solves the problem in a suboptimal way; combining values after
hash-finalization is going to both hash worse and slower than before it.
The real way requires an interface change to how std::hash works
(exposing more internal hasher state). I know people have been working on
this, but evidently it didn't reach C++17 either.
- Uses boost::hash instead of std::hash. This is probably the biggest killer
for me.
- Can easily be implemented by ourselves by lifting the core parts of the
Boost implementation. (It's about 20 lines.)
I could go either way, but my immediate thought is probably that we should
copy the Boost implementation into some header, and then prefix it with a
warning saying that you shouldn't use this if you need optimal performance or
hash distribution.
Steinar */
#ifndef MY_HASH_COMBINE_INCLUDED
#define MY_HASH_COMBINE_INCLUDED
#if defined(_MSC_VER)
#define MY_FUNCTIONAL_HASH_ROTL32(x, r) _rotl(x, r)
#else
#define MY_FUNCTIONAL_HASH_ROTL32(x, r) (x << r) | (x >> (32 - r))
#endif /* _MSC_VER */
template <typename SizeT>
inline void my_hash_combine(SizeT &seed, SizeT value) {
seed ^= value + 0x9e3779b9 + (seed << 6) + (seed >> 2);
}
inline void my_hash_combine(std::uint32_t &h1, std::uint32_t k1) {
const uint32_t c1 = 0xcc9e2d51;
const uint32_t c2 = 0x1b873593;
k1 *= c1;
k1 = MY_FUNCTIONAL_HASH_ROTL32(k1, 15);
k1 *= c2;
h1 ^= k1;
h1 = MY_FUNCTIONAL_HASH_ROTL32(h1, 13);
h1 = h1 * 5 + 0xe6546b64;
}
inline void my_hash_combine(std::uint64_t &h, std::uint64_t k) {
const std::uint64_t m = 0xc6a4a7935bd1e995ull;
const int r = 47;
k *= m;
k ^= k >> r;
k *= m;
h ^= k;
h *= m;
// Completely arbitrary number, to prevent 0's
// from hashing to 0.
h += 0xe6546b64;
}
#endif /* MY_HASH_COMBINE_INCLUDED */